Digital Workplace Logo

News

You are here: Home » Type of post » Rebranding » Should you have a Web 2.0 Strategy?

Thanks for visiting the Digital Workplace Group (DWG) website. You'll see this post may refer to the "Intranet Benchmarking Forum (IBF)," the "Digital Workplace Forum (DWF)" or "IBF Live." But that doesn't match our website name!

In a nutshell, we merged IBF and DWF into one service and changed our name to "Digital Workplace Group." The new name represents the broader set of services we've grown to offer, beyond an original focus on just intranets. We also changed the name of our monthly webinar from "IBF Live" to "Digital Workplace Live."

Although we've relabelled things, we're proud of our decade+ history and have left this page intact. Enjoy your time on our site and please contact us with any questions or comments.

I’ve seen a
number of conference flyers recently that talk about "developing your Web
2.0 strategy" for your Intranet. It set me wondering
if an organisation have such a thing as a separate Web 2.0 strategy – in the sense
of an agreed roadmap for the next few years?

The
Case For

Generally, when a substantial change is taking place, it does make sense to have a structured
approach that involves all stakeholders and asks the usual good questions: why?
Where? When? and Who? This applies if the change is internally driven (e.g. to
improve supply chain efficiency) or due to external circumstances (an economic
downturn is an example that springs to mind).

Having a Web 2.0
strategy will allow an organisation to focus efforts – avoiding duplication of
effort and sharing knowledge gained. Without it there’s a risk that users
become confused with multiple innovations all offering similar features, for
example. It also means that resources can be pooled, so that infrastructure can
be properly supported rather than ‘best efforts’ by an enthusiast.

The
Case against

I can see two
different camps that would counsel against a specific Web 2.0 strategy,
however:

The ‘Integrators’
will say that Web 2.0 should not be treated as something apart from what the
organisation already has or is trying to achieve. A wiki, for example, is an
approach to content management, so to have a strategy for wikis that is set
apart from that for content management just creates parallel systems and
potential conflict. Much better to have strategies for outcomes – Communication
and Collaboration, for example, and use the most appropriate tool, whatever the
label.

The ‘Liberals’, for
quite different reasons, would argue that the whole spirit of Web 2.0 is to
experiment and see what happens. Devising a strategy misses the point. It is
both lumbering and risks losing the very benefits that Web 2.0 can bring:
freedom from a top-down way of thinking.

Sitting
on the fence

My own feeling is
that organisations worry too much about re-inventing the wheel. If you relax
control and let it happen – who knows – you might end up with a better wheel!
You at least have more people that have learned something about how wheels are
made. Therefore in the early stages, the
‘strategy’ for Web 2.0 should be to allow experimentation with low-cost,
easily-started approaches and focus on learning from what happens. The strategy
should also be clear what will happen when something starts to take off. At
that point it makes sense to think about a longer-term perspective and ensure
it integrates both with the IT ecosystem and also the business direction.

About the author

Nancy Goebel - DWG's Managing Director for Member & Benchmarking ServicesNancy Goebel is DWG’s Managing Director for Member Services. In addition to heading up service delivery, she is responsible for member engagement, retention and growth. Nancy also sits on DWG’s Board of Directors.

Prior to joining the Digital Workplace Group, Nancy was a accomplished executive at JPMorgan Chase where she built and led a global team in desigining and implementing an award-winning intranet. She also led digital enablement and business re-engineering initiatives.

Outside work, Nancy is a wine maker, fundraiser, meditator, wife and mother of two.

Connect with Nancy on Twitter: @nancyatdwg or on Google +.

2 Comments

  1. I firmly believe that the Intranet of the future is a social one. There is far more value in the interactions between people than in links between web pages and documents.
    The “Intranet” will be a different view for each person, depending on the virtual groups in which they work… i.e. the Intranet is just a flow of ALL the information generated by your own internal people networks, with no official content authors.
    Our Intranet is 100% user generated, and it’s the most useful one I’ve ever had.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Are you ready for the digital workplace?
Learn and explore the new digital world of work.
Your information will never be shared with any third party.
Are you ready to connect with DWG?
Learn and explore the new digital world of work.
Your information will never be shared with any third party.
I hereby acknowledge that the Digital Workplace 24 Video Library is designated for my professional use alone and may not be shared with any other parties, in whole or in part, without express written permission from the Digital Workplace Group.